|
What costs are you referring to? I don't see any pros to removing part of a dog's tail, or ears, or anything. If the dog isn't going to be in an environment where having a long tail or ears is dangerous, there's no reason for those body parts to be removed. Hunting dogs would get cropped and docked to avoid injury to those parts, since floppy ears and long tails can get caught on things and are more prone to injury. Fighting dogs would get docked and cropped so that there's less to latch onto or to look more tough. "Breed standards" are stupid, to me. The isn't how the dog was born. It's as pointless as circumcision is in humans, and both are simply a tradition carried on by humans who don't think twice because that's just "how it's done." I feel pretty strongly about bodily autonomy and think it makes no sense unless the ears and tail being long is somehow hazardous to the animal, which can happen, like with hunting dogs. And they do feel the pain- we all know that, but I think it's important. Studies done on humans have shown that feeling intense pain at a very young age, including just days old, actually affects the nervous system development and can cause long-term damage on the brain! I think one study even said it was linked to anxiety disorders later in life. Apart from the tradition aspect, it can also be about money. I go on craigslist frequently and see that people are willing to pay more for dogs that are docked and cropped, and humans are often greedy, so... that perpetuates the tradition, I guess. It makes me sad!
| 
