I don't support nor am I against PETA. But I do think that this organization still needs to be active and prospering. The reason being is that if you have one side, you need to have that other side to balance things out. So for example, a Democrat often needs it's Republican to understand it's side of the argument. PETA is a perfect example to argue against or for in terms of the opposite party.
Something I've learned is that when you're sacrificing yourself to do better for someone else, other things must be let go. Perhaps they were focusing on one particular project and didn't realize that that project destroyed shelter homes in the long-run. But overall saved the wildlife somewhere in USA. There's pros and cons.
But I mean, come on. You know that if PETA closes down, another PETA-like organization will come forth and perhaps be a bit more crazier. Plus, PETA has some good and strange arguments that makes my day.
Quote:PETA wants Ben & Jerry's ice cream to use breast milk
^ You don't see this everyday.
| 
