(06-16-2012, 05:40 AM)andrew320 Wrote: It's most likely that those two animals are the most in need and of course they've been the world's two pets for generations. I mean, I love monkeys but I don't think I could have a monkey in our city apartment.
I can see your argument with a rabbit, but if you use a monkey as an example then why not a tiger, a leopard, a cheetah, a rhinocerous or a koala bear?
These two animals have the worst luck and should be taken by loving families that have the room to take care of them.
There is no comparison with what you said.
Small monkeys are comparable in size with cats, and some dogs. Some of them are also very domesticated and well trained, and they are certainly not dangerous. There is nothing in common with the list of wild dangerous large animals you mentioned.
Dogs and cats have the worst luck? Again, I disagree. They are being pets for many generations. While horses, cattle, chickens, pigs, are being worked as slaves and being butchered. Many other animals were shot on sight and were driven to the edge of extinction.Dogs and cats have the BEST luck if it's my opinion.
