Thats a serious case of spoiling a dog which paradoxically would spoil its chances for longevity and vim. This kind of pampering is not uncommon with those people who hire pet sitters and give generous gratuities to the practitioners of this vocation. There is nothing inherently wrong with the practice only that the implications are less than flattering. You see, dogs are like little kids, they learn through positive reinforcement until a certain action crystallizes in their mind as the norm. To get a dog to change such a habit is a similar process in the opposite direction, that of unlearning the habit. Pampering has made some dogs complete wrecks and they can stay for days on end without feeding, brooding and generally irritable until their choice indulgence or delicacy is provided. I think we should accept the fact that dogs and other domesticated animals for that matter retain an element of their wild selves which is manifest in their dentition and quadripedal motion and trying to change them into humans would be denying them a crucial aspect of self expression. Hardy animals are happier and appreciate the small things of life especially the periodic treats and this yields a positive dividend with regard to their lifespan. Scientists have found that even exposure to germs by men and pets alike is beneficial since it preps the body's immune system and memory to be on alert and its not likely to be taken by surprise by marauding pathogens.